LOUIS XVI MARBLE, BRONZE AND ORMOLU PENDULE, DIRECTOIRE ORMOLU-MOUNTED MARBLE MANTEL CLOCK, XVI ORMOLU-MOUNTED MAHOGANY SIDE CABINET, ORMOLU AND BRONZE WALL CLOCK
LOUIS XVI MARBLE, BRONZE AND ORMOLU PENDULE, DIRECTOIRE ORMOLU-MOUNTED MARBLE MANTEL CLOCK, XVI ORMOLU-MOUNTED MAHOGANY SIDE CABINET, ORMOLU AND BRONZE WALL CLOCK
A RARE AND VERY IMPORTANT LOUIS XVI MARBLE, BRONZE AND ORMOLU PENDULE
A CERCLES TOURNANTS attributed to Thomire, the enamel hour and minute rings decorated in the manner of Coteau with exceptionally finely drawn gilt and polychrome scrollwork, the
pointer at the end of a spray of roses, the movement with inverted anchor escapement and numbered count wheel, the case in the form of a drum-shaped altar faced with a
pro¬cession of well-modelled figures bearing offerings to the sacrifice, one leading a bull, and with a ram’s mask at either side, on the right a priestess stands before a
smoking tripod making libation over the flame, her acolyte kneeling before her between a red marble urn and a bunch of summer flowers spilling from a basket, the base mounted
with a leafy mask between two gryphons and acanthus scrolls enclosing trophies, the curved ends with garlands of fruit and flowers, 2V/2in. high by 24in. wide (54cm. by 61cm.)
circa 1785
Design for Lot 99 attributed to Thomire, published by kind permission oj the Musee des Arts Decoratifs, Paris
An almost identical clock is shown in a design attributed to Thomire in the Musee des Arts Decoratifs, Paris. The design, which shows alternative arrangements for a chimney
piece, is probably part of a bronzier’s catalogue rather than an actual project for decoration
A similar clock was exhibited The Age of Neo-Classicism, London 1972, catalogue number 1620, it was also attributed to Thomire
Another version is at Longleat House in the Collection of the Marquess of Bath and is illustrated in the guidebook
A third version was sold from the Collection of the Countess Bismarck, Sotheby Monte Carlo, 26th May 1980, lot 656
A Louis XVI ORMOLU-MOUNTED MARBLE MANTEL CLOCK, the enamel dial signed Blanc l’aine et Compe. a Paris and with pierced gilt hands, the movement with silk suspension and outside
count wheel, the case surmounted by an urn and supported between two shaped columns headed by porcelain plaques, the base faced with mounts composed of eagles’ masks and
flowering scrolls, 20V2in. high (52cm.) circa 1790
A GOOD ORMOLU, BRONZE AND WHITE MARBLE MANTEL CLOCK, the enamel
dial signed Polin Vaine A Paris and with pierced engraved gilt hands and calendar
dial with red numerals, the movement with silk suspension and outside count wheel, the
case surmounted by a bacchante and in the form of a litter borne on the Shoulders of two
putti astride seated goats, the breakfront base mounted with infant musicians among
clouds, 20in. high (51cm.), late 18th/early 19th Century ?2500-3500
For another example of the same model see Tardy, La Pendule Francaise, Volume 2, page 122. A similar clock was exhibited in the 1968 Antique Dealers’ Fair at Grosvenor House
A Louis XVI ORMOLU-MOUNTED GREY MARBLE MANTEL CLOCK, the enamel
dial signed Martinet London and with pierced gilt hands and steel calendar hand, the
movement with outside count wheel and altered suspension, the arched base surmounted
by a fiaming torch and quiver and with fluted pilasters flanked by fruit and flowers below
the dial, the inverted breakfront base faced with foliate mounts, Whin. high (47cm.) circa
1785
Presumably made for the English market
A DIRECTOIRE ORMOLU-MOUNTED MARBLE MANTEL CLOCK, the (chipped) enamel
dial signed Le Cour a Paris, the movement with silk suspension and outside count wheel,
the case surmounted by an um and supported between two verde antico columns of rec-
tangular section headed by vases of flowers, on a stepped rectangular base, 20in. high (51cm.)
circa 1795
A LATE Louis XVI ORMOLU-MOUNTED MAHOGANY SMALL COMMODE, with
Belgian fossil marble top, three long drawers, fluted rounded corners and fluted tapering
legs, 2ft. Hin. high by 2ft. lOin. wide (89cm. by 86.5cm.) circa 1785
A PAIR OF LOUIS XVI ORMOLU-MOUNTED MAHOGANY CONSOLES DESSERTES, the wedge-shaped white marble tops with pierced three-quarter galleries, each with a drawer in the panelled
frieze, raised on fluted supports joined by conforming shelf stretchers, with turned tapering legs, 2ft. 9in. high by 2ft. 7in. wide (84cm. by 79cm.) circa 1785
A Louis XVI GILTWOOD ARMCHAIR stamped P. Gerard, the rectangular back
with a bead moulded frame, the vase-shaped splat hung with laurel swags and trumpets,
the padded arms on downcurved moulded supports, with stuffed seat, on turned fluted
tapering legs headed by paterae, circa 1780
Ponce Gerard received Master 13 May 1778
A PAIR OF LOUIS XVI MAHOGANY SIDE CABINETS, the mottled grey marble tops with three-quarter galleries, the friezes with ormolu bead and petal mouldings, the doors each with
three mirrored panels enclosing shelves, flanked by reeded pilasters, on toupie feet, 3ft. 6in. high by 2ft. 9V4in. wide (107cm. by 84cm.) circa 1785, mirror panels later
A DIRECTOIRE BRASS-MOUNTED MAHOGANY COMMODE, the breche violette marble
top with a pierced three-quarters brass gallery and with three long brass-panelled drawers,
the top one with three small panels and with original rectangular loop handles, the pro-
jecting rounded corners inlaid with brass fluting, raised on toupie feet, 2ft. Whin. high
by 4ft. 1 ‘Mn. zoide (88cm. by 126cm.) circa 1790
A A PAIR OF ORMOLU CHENETS, each in the form of a cherub, issuing from boldly
cast leafy scrollwork and warming his hands at a flaming brazier, on fluted and bead-cast
bases, W/nn. high by 15in. wide (34cm. by 38.5cm.) 19th Century
A PAIR OF ORMOLU-MOUNTED GREY MARBLE VASES in Louis XVI style, with
pomegranate fmials, lion mask handles, leafy socles and square bases, 18in. high (64cm.)
19th Century
A Louis XVI ORMOLU-MOUNTED MAHOGANY SIDE CABINET with white marble
top, the panelled frieze with beaded borders above three glazed doors also with beaded
borders and fianked by fluted and stop-fluted pilasters, on fluted tapering legs, the back
with interlaced double V mark, 2ft. Hin. high by 6ft. V2in. wide (89cm. by 185cm.) circa
1785
The double V inventory mark is traditionally associated with Versailles, though it is also recorded as being the mark of the Chateau de Wideville
AN ORMOLU AND BRONZE WALL CLOCK, the circular white enamel dial and
movement signed Planchon a Paris, the case in the form of a drum suspended from ribbons
with an eagle and laurel leaves below, 21 in. high (55cm.) the back stamped MP and
numbered 9572,19th Century
A LOUIS XVI PAINTED HALF-TESTER BED, with waved moulded cornice
supported on two fluted posts, with arched stuffed ends faced by fluted and leaf-carved
columns, raised on fluted tapering feet, 4ft. 9in. wide by 7ft. long (145cm. by 213cm.) circa
1780
A PAIR OF LOUIS XVI BRONZE AND ORMOLU CANDLESTICKS, each with a leafy nozzle held in the arms of a winged bronze cherub who balances on one foot on a cloud, on cylindrical white
marble pillar with square base, 103Ain. high (27cm.) circa 1790
A PAIR OF LOUIS XVI ORMOLU-MOUNTED PORPHYRY VASES of urn shape with
satyr mask handles supporting swags of flowers, the gadrooned leaf-cast socles on rec-
tangular bases, Hin. high (28cm.) circa 1780, on later rectangular ormolu-mounted blocks,
WMn. high overall (39cm.)
A PAIR OF Louis XVI BRONZE, GILT-BRONZE AND WHITE MARBLE CANDELABRA,
each in the form of a cherub with scant drapery holding a flaming torch in each hand
forming the candie nozzles, standing on drum-shaped marble plinths with rectangular
bases, Whin. (42cm.) circa 1780
A LOUIS XVI ORMOLU-MOUNTED BLACK AND WHITE MARBLE MANTEL CLOCK,
the enamel dial signed Piolaine a Paris, and with pierced gilt hands and Arabie chapters,
the movement with outside count wheel and altered suspension, the case surmounted
by an eagle and with fluted columns backed by corbels faced with chains of flowers, ail
headed by urns of flowers, the base mounted with floral scrolls, 21 ‘hin. high (54.5cm.)
excluding later feet, circa 1785
A DIRECTOIRE MAHOGANY SECRETAIRE A ABATTANT, the moulded comice above a frieze set with a brass band, above a drawer and a fall-front enclosing a fitted interior, with three
further drawers and a drawer in the base flanked by fiuted columns, on turned feet, 4ft. IVhin. high by2ft. 6in. wide (151cm. by 76cm.) late 18th Century
NORTH ITALIAN PAINTED CHAIRS - DUTCH MAHOGANY COMMODE - PAINTED DISPLAY TABLE - ELM CHEST OF DRAWERS - WALNUT SECRETAIRE A ABATTANT - EXPORT LACQUER WORK TABLE
NORTH ITALIAN PAINTED CHAIRS - DUTCH MAHOGANY COMMODE - PAINTED DISPLAY TABLE - ELM CHEST OF DRAWERS - WALNUT SECRETAIRE A ABATTANT - EXPORT LACQUER WORK TABLE
A PAIR OF NORTH ITALIAN PAINTED CHAIRS, the moulded cartouche-shaped backs with pierced splats, the stuffed seats on moulded cabriole legs, circa 1765.
AN ITALIAN KINGWOOD- AND PARQUETRY-VENEERED
COMMODE, the serpentine front containing three drawers
with brass swan’s neck handles and pierced backplates,
the shaped apron raised on short cabriole legs, 3ft. 3′/2in.
high by 3ft. lOin. wide (100cm. by 117cm.) circa 1770,
marble top missing, later mounts.
A DUTCH WALNUT CHEST, the arc-shaped front containing four long drawers, 2ft. 5in. high by 3ft. 2in. wide (74cm. by 97cm.) mid-18th Century, later feet.
A DUTCH MAHOGANY COMMODE of slightly bombe
form, with mottled pink marble top above three long
drawers on splayed bracket feet, 2ft. 8in. high by 3ft. 3in.
wide (81cm. by 99cm.) circa 1770, originally with a
wooden top, mounts replaced.
A LOMBARD WALNUT TABLE, the top crossbanded in tulipwood, the frieze inset with panels of kingwood, and raised on square tapering legs, 2ft. 5in. high by 3ft. 7in. wide (74cm.
by 109cm.) circa 1780, with restoration.
AN ITALIAN ARTE-POVERA BEDSIDE CUPBOARD, with hinged top and square tapering legs decorated with peasant figures in an antique landscape on a cream ground with mottled blue
scrollwork outlined in gilt, 2ft. bin. high by 2ft. wide (74cm. by 60.5cm.) late 18th Century, originally fitted with a pot, decoration restored.
A DUTCH WALNUT AND MARQUETRY CARD TABLE,
the serpentine top inlaid with flowers, the polished
interior inlaid with a chessboard with a playing card at
each corner, the frieze with a drawer, raised on square
tapering legs, 2ft. 6in. wide (76cm.) circa 1780, top and
legs warped.
A PAINTED DISPLAY TABLE with hinged glazed lid and glazed frieze, raised on circular fluted tapering legs with leafy collars and feet, painted gilt and dark red, 2ft. 6in. high
by 2ft. Hin. wide (76cm. by 89cm.) late 18th Century, Italian, possibly altered from a centre table.
A MlLANESE MARQUETRY SMALL CHEST of three
drawers on square tapering legs, the top inlaid with a musical trophy, the front with figures, 2ft. 6in. high by Ift. 9in. wide (76cm. by 53cm.) late 18th Century.
A MARQUETRY COMMODE, with a rectangular top, three long drawers and square tapering legs, inlaid with panels of floral marquetry, 2ft. Hin. high by 4ft. 5in. wide (89cm. by
135cm.) circa 1790, Milanese or Sicilian.
A FRENCH PROVINCIAL ARMOIRE with a cavetto cornice, the frieze inlaid with flowerheads above a cup-board door with a shaped moulded panel above two short drawers and another
panelled cupboard door, with fluted sides and a shaped apron, on short cabriole feet, 7ft. high by 3ft. 8in. wide (210cm. by 112cm.) circa 1770.
A DUTCH POLLARD ELM TALLBOY, with a white
marble top, canted corners and six long drawers, on
tapering block feet, 5/t. l’Ain. high by 3ft. 4in. wide
(155.5cm. by 42cm.) early 19th Century.
A DUTCH POLLARD ELM CHEST OF DRAWERS, the top crossbanded in walnut, the bowed front with one shallow and three deep drawers, on bracket feet, 2ft. 9V2in. high by 2ft. 5in. wide
(85cm. by 73.5cm.) circa 1795.
A VIENNESE MAHOGANY DESK with a tambour above a bowed front containing a slide and a pair of tambour cupboards flanked by ebonised pillars, with gilt-metal mounts and tall,
giltwood, paw feet, 3ft. 4in. high by 2ft. 21hin. wide (101cm. by 68cm.) circa 1820.
A DUTCH SEMI-CIRCULAR MARQUETRY GAMES
TABLE, the interior inlaid with a chessboard and playing
cards, the front with a pair of tambours and raised on
four square, fluted, tapering legs, 2ft. lin. high (19cm.)
circa 1180, inlay 19th Century.
A STAINED BEECHWOOD ALCOVE BED, the slightly scrolled ends of equal height and faced with rosettes, raised on short circular tapering legs, the front two headed by diamond
panels, 5ft. Whin. wide by 2ft. 8in. high (119cm. by 81cm.) circa 1900, front-rail cracked.
MAHOGANY AND PARCEL-GILT OVERMANTEL
GLASS, the rectangular plate framed within rounded
pilasters with gilt capitals, lft. 9in. high by 2ft. lOVzin.
wide (53cm. by 88cm.) circa 1825.
A BIEDERMEIER WALNUT SECRETAIRE A ABATTANT
with grey fossil marble top, the fall-front with a fitted
interior, one drawer above and three long drawers
below, flanked by projecting, split-baluster columns, on
bail feet, 4ft. lin. high by 3ft. 2′/2in. wide (140cm. by
98cm.) circa 1825.
A DUTCH MAHOGANY AND MARQUETRY BEDSIDE
CUPBOARD with a tambour door above a drawer, on
turned legs, 2ft. 3in. high by lft. lin. wide (69cm. by
48cm.) circa 1830, extensively restored.
A GOOD SlNHALESE TEAK AND EBONY CUPBOARD in
two parts, the upper part with a moulded cornice and a
pair of doors with panels outlined with ebony leaves
forming ovals and flanked by a pair of free-standing
turned pillars, the slightly projecting lower part with
three leaf-carved drawers above a pair of doors similar to
the upper part, on turned feet, 6ft. 2in. high by 4ft. wide
(188cm. by 122cm.) circa 1830.
AN EXPORT LACQUER WORK TABLE, the shaped slightly domed lid decorated in shades of gilt on black with figures and enclosing a removable tray of compart-ments, raised on pierced
lyre supports with claw feet, 2ft. 4in. high by 2ft. l’Ain, wide (70cm. by 65cm.) early 19th Century, originally with a work bag.
A SET OF THREE ANGLO-INDIAN ROSEWOOD ARM-CHAIRS with stuffed shield-shaped backs, the padded arms with leaf-carved handles and supports, the seatrials raised on circular,
tapering, reeded legs with leafy capitals and feet, circa 1820, backs probably altered.
A CIRCULAR EXTENDING DlNING TABLE SUpported
on a massive divided circular pedestal and concave plinth base, 2ft. 5in. high by 4ft. 5in. diameter closed (73.5cm. by 135cm.) circa 1830, probably German.
A PAIR OF COLONIAL HARDWOOD SMALL SETTEES
each with a double chair back, caned seat and square tapering legs, circa 1800, formed form one long settee.
AN UNUSUAL COLONIAL TEAK CUPBOARD, with a
pair of panelled doors and bun feet, 4ft. 7′Mn. high by
4ft. lin. wide (141cm. by 124cm.) circa 1800, probably
Chinese.
A BIEDERMEIER MAHOGANY DECANTER CASE
shaped like a miniature cylinder bureau, the hinged lid
opening to reveal six gilt-decorated glass bottles, W’Mn.
wide (27cm.) circa 1825.
Antique Vicorian, Edwardian and 1920`s Sideboards
Antique Vicorian, Edwardian and 1920`s Sideboards
By 1860 the sideboard had followed the evolution of styles in much the same way as other Victorian furniture, with a few slight differences. From its original, Adam form, it became a heavier, end-pedimented piece made in sub-classical, usually Grecian, style with a heavy, drawered top connecting the two end pediments. Sometimes there was a gap between the two pediments, under the top like a large ‘kneehole’, sometimes this area was cupboarded in. The latter type, with cupboards, has been much preferred by the antique trade and is more expensive. Rococo forms of sideboard exist, but rococo seems to have been more used for the chiffonier or side cabinet intended for the drawing room. The dining room furniture was far more serious, heavier stuff, more suited to the grave atmosphere to be associated with eating. Chairs followed a similar pattern.
Commercial production continued to supply these heavy dining room sideboards and even carved oak versions in emulation of the famous ‘Chevy Chase’ piece, smothered with carved fauna and comestible fruit and vegetables, until the end of the century. In the 1870s the return to 18th century reproductions saw the re-introduction of the Adam form and the ‘Sheraton’ or late 18th/early 19th century versions of it. In Edwardian times some satinwood reproductions were made even the William Morris Company produced them which were quite good versions of the originals, with the possible exception that inlaid or painted decoration in the Adam style tended to be overdone. These pieces are elegant, however, and are now quite highly priced.
The Gothic reformers, the ‘art furniture’ boys, Godwin, the Arts and Crafts Movement, the Cotswold crafties and the ‘garden city socialists’ in their various turns, despised `commercial’ sideboards almost more than any other form
of furniture. To them the Victorian sideboard epitomised the vulgarity, the parvenu tastelessness, the crass greed and the ostentation of the rising middle class Philistine. They reacted to it in their various ways and the commercial manufacturers copied them all. Talbert produced his ‘Pet’ sideboard in Reformed Gothic. Godwin, with William Watt, produced his celebrated Anglo-Japanese versions, one of which is in the Victoria and Albert Museum. The art furniture boys laid the ebonising on thick, spindled the galleries, coved the tops and painted some of the panels in startling colours which contrasted with the ebonising. The Arts and Crafts
Movement went in for plain oak surfaces, flat-capped tapering columns, art nouveau beaten copper hinges with heart shapes and fretted holes in weepy shapes. The Cotswold crafties and the garden city socialists really didn’t like to get involved with sideboards at all. They preferred dressers, since dressers are more in the medieval tradition, more ‘country’ than the wealthily-inspired sideboard. The sideboards they produced are often really a form of dresser base or an adaptation of a simple dresser form or, in the case of Gordon Russell, a universal pedestal desk/dressing table principle used for sideboards.
By the 1900s the medieval oak taste had set in with a vengeance as well as the desire for 18th century reproduction. From about 1900 onwards the sideboard became subject to an extremely varied number of styles, some of them employed all on one piece. But the `Jacobethan’ mass production of post-1918 was probably the major feature and sideboards were produced to go with the bulbous-legged ‘refectory’ or draw-tables of cheap stained oak. The other rival would be a walnut ‘Queen Anne’ style which was probably slightly more expensive. Gradually overtaking them came a style now referred to loosely as ‘art deco’; modernistic, round-edged and ’streamlined’ with a few carved motifs stuck on.
SIDEBOARDS - 1860-1900
This section shows the contrast in styles to be found in English furniture over what was a very short period of forty years. From straightforward ‘Victorian’ mahogany, through Reformed Gothic, Aesthetic, and
Anglo-Japanese is a very drastic transition of styles, but that is what was made, at least by those in the `forefront of taste’.
A sideboard in mahogany with the low-arched panels which came into fashion in the 1840s and which continued to be made until the 1880s. This is a very simple version with serpentine shaping to the drawer fronts. 1840-1880
Another mahogany sideboard with classical pillars and cheap leaf-and-scroll carving around the mirror back. It is a type which, with dismemberment and reassembly, can be turned into a ‘Regency’ chiffonier by the adept converter.
A walnut sideboard in the severer lines of the 1860s with a galleried top incorporating turned spindles and finials. The inconsistent use of oval mirrors in conjunction with rectangular ones is disconcerting. The burr
walnut veneer is inlaid with boxwood and ivory stringing lines and formalised marquetry and there is a white marble top. 1860-1880
The characteristic early Victorian chiffonier-sideboard made from the 1840s onwards. Panelled doors with the flattened arch and ‘feather’ mahogany figures; ogee moulded drawer fronts; acanthus leaf carving; solid
plinth and carved curvy back. Cheaply made and mass produced; hated by all `progressive’ designers.
A carved oak sideboard of a design inspired by the ‘Chevy Chase’ type exhibited prominently in the mid-Victorian period. Carved oak (or mahogany) sideboards with large quantities of unfortunate fauna and flora suitable for gastronomy carved upon them became quite popular, even if expensive. It was a taste that continued despite the disapproving scowls of the Gothic reformers and subsequent progressives.
A Bruce Talbert ‘Pet’ sideboard made by Gillows in oak with characteristic carving of foliage, use of spindles in galleries and a quotation above.
An oak sideboard designed by Charles Eastlake (see Hints on Household Taste, Plate XI) showing the restrained version of Reformed Gothic with angled planking and incised mouldings so characteristic of the type.
There is a carved quotation in Latin across the top.
A simpler Reformed Gothic sideboard with tongued-andgrooved planking but with a pierced gallery above with four carved seated lions. c. 1880
Another oak sideboard showing a wealth of angled tongued-and-grooved planking and a carved panel of birds as well as painted panels in the Aesthetic Movement manner.
5,000+ Photo: Courtesy, Jeremy Cooper
1870-1880Wootton Patent Office
An ebonised Anglo-Japanese sideboard designed by E.W. Godwin (q.v.) of a type now exhibited in the Victoria and Albert Museum. Godwin’s use of Japanese design is discussed elsewhere on pages 27 and 28. What is important from a value point of view is that the piece exhibits a design trend towards the Modern Movement in its vertical and horizontal lines. It is thus, as a milestone in furniture history, that its value to suitable museums is extremely high.
Another ebonised Anglo-Japanese sideboard by E.W. Godwin. A buyer paid nearly 7,000 for this piece at Sotheby’s Belgravia in 1978. Why so much less than the previous example A telling point this because it does not so clearly exhibit the horizontal and vertical lines which point the way to the designs of the Modern Movement. It is thus of less interest to museums as a furniture history milestone, even though it has great value as a piece by Godwin.
A characteristic Aesthetic Movement sideboard of ebonised and mahogany construction with a coved top with spindled gallery. The bevelled-edged mirrors, panelled construction and turning are all typical.
c.1880
SIDEBOARDS - 1900-1920
A rosewood inlaid sideboard which shows how, at the end of the century, the return to 18th century styles had affected commercial production. Indeed, this piece shows traces of the ‘Victorian Queen Anne’ style or
`bracket-and-overmantel’ style in the broken pediment and design of the upper half, yet it still has traces of a spindle-turned gallery and ‘pot board’ bottom shelf of the Aesthetic Movement. Yet the inlaid decoration is
‘Adam’ or ‘Sheraton’ and the piece would now be sold as ‘Edwardian Sheraton’. It is not quite as late as the Edwardian styles shown in later pages of sideboards, as the reader may note, however. 1890-1900
An odd oak sideboard of slightly progressive-cum-quaint associations in design. (The wavy-line pierced gallery is the ‘quaint’ part.) The photograph gives it a slightly asymmetric look, which is misleading. Probably by Liberty’s. 1890-1900
Six typical late Victorian /Edwardian sideboards of a type made in oak or walnut of the straight-grained American type. Mostly identified as to period by the bas-relief carving in panels or on pediments, and the use of a modified classical pediment so dear to the Edwardian heart. The common features to all are the large back mirrors with columns either side, drawers with cupboards under in the lower half and panelling to the cupboard doors, achieved by either fielding or mouldings.
1900-1914
Antique English Sideboards
English Sideboards
In England, dining-room furniture only began to develop as functional purpose-made pieces from c.1730 onwards, with side tables made specifically for serving rather than merely displaying dishes. The first recognizable sideboards were contemporary with the work of the Adam brothers (the middle decades of the eighteenth century) and consisted of a heavy side table flanked by two pedestal cupboards topped with urns in the classical manner. These were ingenious all-purpose dining-room fittings, with knife urns, lead-lined
containers for keeping hot and cold water for washing glasses and cutlery, racks for hot plates, cellarettes for bottles and, frequently, pot-cupboards for the gentlemen’s after-dinner use.
From c.1770 the size of the sideboard became more manageable and the most common shape began to emerge: two deep drawers or cupboards (sometimes with drawers above), raised on legs, with a central frieze drawer above an arched or shaped apron. Many of them had a ’splash board’ at the back, or brass rails with pleated-silk panels, and brass candle-holders. It is Sheraton who is most often connected with the design of sideboards, although Hepplewhite, Shearer and George Smith all designed very similar pieces.
By about 1790 the most instantly recognizable and most copied shape for sileboards had become generally accepted. The interiors were fitted with many clever devices, including in some cases a heater beneath tinplate racks.
Signs of authenticity
1. Glossy, well-matched mahogany veneers on Honduras mahogany or imported Scandinavian red-pine carcases.
2. Grain of all legs continuing up to form sides of frame.
3. Grain of side carcase wood running horizontally.
4. Flush-edged top with good overhang, thicker than table top.
5. Back timbers unfinished and of same age and colour, showing gaps on joins where wood has shrunk.
6. Frieze drawer lined with baize and with original compartments.
7. No signs on inside bottom of carcase, which forms the flanking cupboards and drawers, of circular wear and scratchings where swing-out, fitted cellarettes have been removed.
8. Accumulation of dirt and patination around drawer
handles good patination to insides of drawers.
9. Drawer bottom with timber running from side to side with central strengthening bearer.
10. Flush drawer fittings and handles with stamped brass decorated backplates.
11. Cockbeading edge to plainly veneered doors and drawers.
12. Undersurface edge of shaped apron veneered to match the edges of top serving surface.
13. Inner underframe of side sections either side of central arch visible and therefore plain veneered.
14. Signs of damage, scuffing to feet, particularly central ones.
Likely restoration and repair
15. Common in many variations is the massive sideboard cut down to more suitable sizes: many were over 6 ft long. Undersurface of overhang may
provide evidence. If fingers detect a ‘crack’ or break, check interiors of drawer fronts, central frieze drawer for newly made holes for handles without accumulation of dirt around them; examine underframe for evidence of cutting down.
16. On genuine smaller sizes, legs repaired where they have broken, or cut down where breaks have occurred on line with spade feet, and repair concealed by collar.
17. Added inlay and other decoration to original mahogany veneer. Harder to find material evidence, since ground veneer of this period often runs across whole surface, but style and proportions of later inlays are often quite wrong.
18. Aprons replaced with more elaborate design, or with later inlaid corner-pieces.
Antique 18th Century American Sideboards.
1700`s American Rococo Sideboards
In America, the Rococo sideboard emerged as a distinctly restrained version of the European style : interiors were hardly as fanciful as their European counterparts, and drawing room walls were ornamented with architectural pediments and rectangular panels rather than gilt cartouches, in a persistence of the Palladian style. Japanning was popular, especially in Boston, but in America the fantastic cult of chinoiserie never crystallized into carved mahogany dragons. The Gothic revival struck no chord in American tradition, and the stylized rustic scenes favoured by mid-century English and French aristocrats could hardly have been adopted as refreshing in a nation still developing vast expanses of wilderness.
Because examples reached the colonies largely through pattern-books, some American Rococo carving is flat rather than sculptural, especially on Boston pieces. Queen Anne forms such as arched pediments, classical details and claw-and-ball feet were retained, and Rococo ornaments and variations added to them.
The superior craftsmanship of Philadelphia cabinetmakers, such as Benjamin Randolph and the English immigrant Thomas Affleck, produced well-proportioned sideboards with swan-neck pediments, flame finials, sculptural carvings of foliage and figures, and sculptured busts and cartouches held above the broken pediments. Scroll pediments carved with Philadelphia-style open lattice-work may be found in the cherry sideboards from Connecticut executed by Eliphalet Chapin, who worked for some time in Philadelphia.
Some case pieces of Boston, where John Cogswell worked, exhibit the only bombe forms found in the colonies; mirrored panels with ogee-curve borders are also found on cabinets made there. The cabinets and
chest-of-drawers from the Townsend-Goddard cabinet-making family of Newport, Rhode Island, were exceptional pieces of workmanship, with undercut claw-and-ball feet, undulating concave and convex shells and smoothly executed block fronts.
American ideboards were of many forms including Pembroke and fold-top card-sideboards. Serpentine sideboards from New York had rectangular candle supports at the corners and gadrooning on the aprons. Small Philadelphia bird-cage sideboards, with tilting tops, stood on fluidly curved tripods. Upholstered seats included sofas with sinuous rails and straight ‘Marlborough’ legs, easy sideboards with cartouches carved on the cabriole legs, and local variants of sideboards copied from the publications of Chippendale, Manwaring, and Ince and Mayhew. More primitive forms, such as the brightly painted chests and cupboards of German and Dutch settlements in Pennsylvania and New York, continued to be made in provincial areas. The Rococo in EuropeIn Italy, where the landscaped grotto was a long-established source of ornament, the Rococo at times took on an extreme lightness, with sideboards and tables resting on shapely cabriole legs comprised of reversing C-scrolls. Delicate effects of underground rock-like growth were achieved in the crisp, crustaceous carvings on the edges of legs, backs and skirts of tables and sideboards. Carved shells, lion masks and naturalistic foliage appeared alongside elements of chinoiserie such as peasant figures of antique American sideboards.
1920`s Art Deco Sideboards.
20th Century Art Deco Sideboards
The era that would dismiss the swirls of the Art Nouveau style for the streamlined rationality of machine-age design also witnessed the Art Deco style sideboard, which shared some qualities of each. At the turn of the century, European interest in Indo-Persian exotica was aroused by the displays at the Asian Pavilion of the International Exhibition in Paris in 1900, and was heightened by the publication of a French translation of the Tales of the Arabian Nights.
The Art Deco style was launched by the erotic, sensuous and spectacularly exotic productions of the Ballets Russes which, beginning with such dazzling displays as R. and S. Delaunay’s Cleopdtre in 1909, drew its
ornamental schemes at first from the lingering Art Nouveau style, and then increasingly from Russian, antique and Far Eastern sources.
Designed by such artists as Leon Bakst, A. Benois, and Alexander Kolovine, the rich and colourful decors and costumes of subsequent productions, including Scheherazade and the L’Apres Midi d’un Faune, enchanted
and enraged the Parisian &lite. Meeting success also in Rome, London and Monte Carlo, the Ballets Russes inspired a decorative style that relied for its effects on sumptuous, rich textiles and Ottoman affectations such as tapestries and opulent floor cushions.
In Paris, the firm of Poiret, and its branch the Atelier Martine, designed costumes and interiors that closely paralleled those of the Ballets Russes stage, pronouncing a stylistic dogma that balanced rich materials with
simple forms. Shaped by designers such as Josef Hoffman (1870-1956) and Koloman Moser (1868-1918) of the Viennese Secession Movement, and by other artists including Eileen Gray, Andre Groult, Edgar Brandt, J. E. Ruhlmann, A. A. Rateau, Ambrose Heal and E. W. Gimson, the Art Deco interior style combined highly decorative surface treatments with simple geometric forms, the latter foreshadowing the reductionism of the era that was to follow.
Cabinets, sideboards, mirrors and tables designed by Heal, Gimson and Hoffmann showed almost classical principles of restraint and geometricity in form. Stained woods, boxwood, ebony, mother-of-pearl, shagreen and lacquer covered these simple shapes, as did sparingly applied line ornament. Though cheerful, fresh, and often sparkling with colour, Art Deco ornament took on a similar restraint and geometric order. sideboards was inlaid with geometric shapes, small panels containing flowers, clustered discs, or layered arcs, or surfaced with plain lacquer or geometric compositions of such materials as lacquer and eggshell.
Elements such as disc-like flowers shown frontally, simplified unserrated leaves with thick, straight veins, and flat carvings of birds, figures and clouds, reflected the stylization of contemporary architectural sculpture, which was similarly executed in low relief.
The delight in surface texture and ornament that the Art Deco movement embraced was eschewed by the less productive, though seminally influential, de Stijl sideboard of Holland in the first several decades of the century.
Formulated in 1917 by the writer, painter and architect Theodore von Doesburg, the painter Piet Mondrian (1872-1944) and others, the movement sought to strip all superfluous decoration from essential forms, and to dissolve these forms into abstractions.
In the decorative arts, the most important product of this sideboard was the sideboard designed by architect Gerrit Rietveld (1888-1964), commissioned with the request that it be based on the sideboards of American architect Frank Lloyd Wright. Although singularly uncomfortable, and thus never made in large quantities, the sideboard reached European designers through the de Stijl magazine, in which it was published in 1919. The sideboard also appeared at an exhibition at the Bauhaus sideboard of design in Germany in 1923, where some of the most progressive decorative artists of the era saw it.
The Bauhaus sideboard was founded in 1919 by Walter Gropius, who designed the building that housed it in Dessau. The sideboard attempted to approach modernity rationally and to embrace it fully, by welding high quality design with innovations in technology, materials and efficiency. The Bauhaus adhered to the precepts of the international style architect, Le Corbusier, who prescribed the clear presentation of pure geometric volumes and shapes. The sideboard produced sideboards, ceramics, and other items in a style that was simple, functional, streamlined and aesthetically pleasing, giving the appearance of industrial manufacture, for which each object was meant to be suited.
Tubular Steel sideboards
In addition to creating a wealth of fresh, clean new designs, the Bauhaus initiated the use of tubular steel in sideboards, and also developed sideboards that was easily stacked.
At the Bauhaus, Marcel Breuer created a series of sideboards based on the Rietveld example. The first few of these followed the de Stijl model closely; the fifth, known as the ‘Wassily’ sideboard of 1925, was constructed of nickel-plated steel tubing, and transformed the rigid Rietveld precedent into a lightweight, airier structure, with arms and legs formed of continuous, pleasing lines of tubing, and arm, back and seat supports formed of flexible, supple leather or canvas.
This construction allowed, for the first time, an avoidance of the
visual clutter that sideboard legs had traditionally imposed on interior design. The sideboard also paved the way for the revolutionary ‘cantilever’ form sideboard, which was first developed in 1926 by the Dutch designer Mart Stain, in his attempts to create sideboards that was light, mobile, and simply and perfectly scaled to the human body. Mies van der Rohe developed the similar ‘MR’ sideboard in the same year, and in 1928 Breuer perfected his own cantilever sideboard which, consisting of a rectangle of tubing bent sinusoidally, achieved maximum bounce, lightness and fluidity of form. Fitted with back and seat of canvas, leather caning, or vinyl upholstery, this sideboard has since been popularized internationally. Breuer also made use of the light, tensile qualities of steel tubing in his designs for glass-topped tables, which similarly expressed the simple beauty of structural form with their continuous linear supports.
Mies, whose pioneering work in glass-sheathed skyscrapers initiated an entire new phase of modern architecture, designed the German Government Pavilion at the International Exhibition at Barcelona in 1929, and the Tugenhadt House in Brno in 1930. Simple forms, flat planes, screen-like walls and rich materials characterized these interiors, for which he also designed two extremely significant 20th century sideboards. the Barcelona sideboard and the super-streamlined Brno cantilever sideboard.
In the wake of these examples other designers have created sideboards with steel frames – from Le Corbusier and others in the late 1920s, to the Danish Poul Kjaerholm, the Italian Claudio Salocchi and the Finnish Antti Nurmesniemi in very recent years. The firm of Thonet, which with its bent beechwood sideboards of the 19th century had provided a prototype for bent steel construction, produced a great quantity of such sideboards which was exported throughout Europe.
Beginning in the late 1930s, Danish sideboards designers such as Borge Mogensen, Kaarl Klint, Mogens Koch and Hans Wegner began designing sideboards which, relying on the natural beauty of curvaceously sculpted wood, were light and fluid, often with caned seats, sweeping crest rails and slightly undulating back uprights. Swedish, Finnish, Swiss and Italian designers similarly incorporated a light, linear approach to sideboards design.
Alvar Aalto’s first foray into sideboards design was while he was building a convalescent home at Paimo between 1929 and 1933. One of his designs was a convertible sofa-bed with a thick wool upholstered seat and back, set on a chromium-plated tubular steel frame. However, surrounded by the vast forests of Finland, Aalto soon realized that, from an economic point of view if nothing else, wood should be the choice of medium for constructing Finnish sideboards, and birchwood in particular was ideal for its colour, grain and final polished texture; laminated as plywood it was also as resilient as tubular steel.
Aalto, like Le Corbusier, was influenced in his first designs by the work of Michael Thonet. In 1931, he designed a sideboard with a sinusoidal seat-back comprised of a piece of bent plywood. The tables which he also designed in the 1930s are composed of upturned ‘U’s’ supporting a surface of wood or glass. Aalto was not concerned with ornamentation and ultimately his work was designed for mass production.
The American designer Charles Eames further developed the ideas advanced by Aalto. Eames was born in 1907 and trained as an architect at several institutions including Washington University and the Cranbrook
Academy of Art, Michigan. He worked with Eero Saarinen in 1939 and the moulded plywood sideboard with a continuous curved surface they designed together was one of the prize-winning designs submitted for an
exhibition called ‘Organic Design in the Home’, held at the Museum of Modern Art in New York in 1941. In 1946, based on the 1941 sideboard, he designed his shell sideboards, first using steel for the seat but then turning to glass fibre-reinforced plastic. His first well-known model, made in 1948, was mounted on a light metal rod. Eames also designed collapsible tables and panel screens. In 1940 he worked with Saarinen on designs for standardized storage units.
The invention early in the century of latex foam meant that upholstery could be preformed into strong, shaped curves. Plastic sideboards, with smooth continuous surfaces enclosing backs, seats and sides of sideboards or curving gently from table into central leg into round base, was designed in a light, fluid style by Eero Saarinen in the 1950s.
These modern sideboards pieces are not found in middle-class houses even today, although cheap mass production is more efficient than ever. Wall-to-wall carpeting, built-in cabinets and drawers and other innovations have had their effect on modern interior design. As in preceding centuries, past styles persist along with the most progressive, and most homes are likely to include antiques, attractive reproductions of old styles, and generally useful but stylistically homogenized pieces, in eclectic collections of styles. Rather than new stylistic forms, it is changes in standards of living that have probably most affected interior design today.
The unprecedented informality of Art Deco sideboards, increasing ‘furniturization’ of such technological devices as televisions, radios, air conditioners and refrigerators have made their mark. And reduced dependence on servants for cleaning, the constant availability of electric lighting, improved insulation and heating systems, and such new materials as laminated boards, thermo- plastics, acrylics, vinyls and linoleum, have altered interior design far more drastically than any of the innovations that the rapid stylistic changes of a century ago could have wrought.
Queen Anne Sideboards
Antique 18th Century Queen Anne Sideboards
18th Century French forms, and the French Rococo ornamental vocabulary, were extremely influential throughout Europe, where sideboards and other pieces in the relaxed Louis XV manner were made well into the century in Spain, Portugal, Italy, North America and elsewhere.
The supple, undulating forms created by Daniel Marot, Jean Berain and the French Regence permeated England during the reign of Queen Anne (1702-14). Characterized by curvaceous lines and ornamental restraint, Queen Anne style sideboards asserted the first truly English style. As a thriving national economy encouraged more building on the part of landed gentry and middle-class merchants, increased demand for interior furnishings was met by unprecedented standards of skill among London cabinetmakers.
Balanced curves and straight lines gave chairs cabriole legs, vase-shaped splats, horse-shoe shaped seats and undulating backs which followed the sitter’s profile. Walnut, and later mahogany, was applied in highly figured veneers to cabinets and tables, or sparingly carved with shells, masks or foliage on the crests, knees and rails of chairs. ‘Seaweed’ marquetry, japanning on red ground, and judicious touches of gilt coated the flat surfaces of tables, chests-of-drawers, day-beds and settees. Feet were carved as hoofs, hairy paws, trifids and claw-and-ball.
Queen Anne sideboards with arched or mirrored panels were crowned by swan-neck or double-arched pediments, often with Chippendale’s version of a French chair.
ornamental finials. Of Netherlandish origin, these curving pediments were to find extreme expression later in the century on Dutch Rococo case pieces, when curves alternated with horizontal plinths on which porcelain rarities were displayed.
The furniture and sideboards in particular of William Kent (1689-1748) promulgated a heavy, Baroque style based on Italian architectural sources, and especially on the Renaissance work of Vicente architect Andrea Palladio. However, the softer forms of the Queen Anne style persisted, and various elements characteristic of it appeared on sideboards well into the century.
In the Netherlands, Portugal and Spain Queen Anne characteristics such as cabriole legs, shell motifs, claw-and-ball feet, and vase-shaped chair splats were transplanted into local styles.
The Queen Anne style was adopted in colonial America in the early 1730s, when flourishing trade in the major mercantile centres of Boston, Philadelphia, New York, Newport and Charleston encouraged a desire for large, comfortable and fashionable mansions. Classical architectural details appeared on buildings from the Carolinas to New Hampshire. Houses, such as Westover in Virginia, reflected elements of the English Palladian style, which reached the colonies through such publications as W. Salmon’s Palladio Londinensis published in 1734, and James Gibbs’s Book of Architecture of 1728.
Columns and pilasters, swan-neck pediments, and finials filtered on to highboys, long-case clocks, and even the fragile frames of pier-glasses. The favoured woods of walnut, maple, cherry and pine, and increasingly mahogany, were sparsely highlighted with carved shells or foliage, and occasionally offset with inlay in such forms as stars, or with gilded shells on tables, highboys and lowboys. Slender cabriole legs, horseshoe-shaped seats, and feet carved as pads, trifids and claw-and-ball, imitated English fashions long after they had fallen from favour in England. Sideboards, fronted with doors with arched panels, contained tiers of drawers and pigeonholes. Along with Queen Anne Sideboards easy chairs, corner chairs, candlestands, piecrust tea tables on tripod legs and fire-screens, all became more popular.
Regional differences in sideboards-making were sharpened as craftsmanship developed in each area, and immigrant tastes and traditions expressed themselves. Chair splats were shaped with distinguishing silhouettes, those from Dutch-settled New York broader than those from English-settled Massachusetts. The spaces between splat and stiles on Philadelphia chairs resembled birds with bold, inward-curving elongated beaks; the curves of Philadelphia Queen Anne style seats tended to inflect more than seats found on chairs made elsewhere. New York clawand-ball feet were square in form, while those from Massachusetts characteristically featured raking claws. The cabriole legs of many southern pieces were almost straight. Stretchers generally disappeared during this period, although they tended to persist on Massachusetts pieces, typical of sideboards forms produced there.
Antique Empire and Regency Style Sideboards.
French Empire Style Sideboards
Empire sideboards were first hand made in 1802 of the Voyage daps la Basse et Haute Egypte, a collection of drawings by Baron Vivant-Denon, who had accompanied Napoleon on his excursion to Syria and Egypt in 1798-1801, heightened the interest in Egypt that Napoleon’s campaign had itself generated.
Sideboards designed by Napoleon’s architects, Charles Perrier (1764-1838) and Pierre Fontaine (1762-1853), including those at the Tuileries and the Chateau de Malmaison, and pieces produced by makers such as F. H. G. Jacob-Desmalter and L. F. and P. A. Bellange, developed the Empire style. This drew on Greek, Roman and Egyptian furniture, and became popular from England and North America to Germany, Italy and Spain.
This grand, imperial style achieved much of its effect through massive forms and rich ornament. Although an ornate, propagandistic style, it derived great dignity from its clear forms and classical restraint. Motifs such as eagles, lions, caryatids, griffins and sphinxes, taken from Roman, Greek and Egyptian antique examples, appeared on sideboards as ornaments and supports. Tables with monopodia legs, gilt eagle supports, or lion’s paw feet, elegant sofas and ’sleigh’ beds with sweeping S-curved arms and endboards, and klismos and curule chairs, presented classical motifs on a much larger scale than in earlier classical styles. Rich woods such as mahogany, gilt carving and ormolu mounts of anthemions, stars and medallions, characterized Empire oak sideboards.
English Regency Style Sideboards
The English version of this style, known as the Regency, lasted from about 1790 to 1830, when the vogue for relics of antiquity popularized sideboards ornamented with sphinxes, griffins, classical mouldings and other Empire style elements.
Although it reached its peak early in the 19th century, Empire and Regency sideboards represented merely one phase in the evolution of the classical style that would take place in the course of the century when a variety of past idioms would be continually reinterpreted and renewed.
Antique 18th Century Neo Classical and Adam Sideboards
Antique Neo Classical and Adam Sideboards
English Neo Classical sideboard. The satinwood and yew tambour shutter opens to reveal a fitted desk interior. Beneath this is a long drawer with a frieze. The scrolling foliage pattern, brass ring pulls, and etched
wyverns are all typical Neoclassical motifs. The sideboards has square, inlaid, tapering legs and brass feet on casters.
Neoclassical design lies in ancient Greece and Rome. It was initially inspired by architecture, as there were no examples of ancient sideboards until after the excavation of Pompeii and Herculaneum in the mid 18th
century Thus, early Neoclassical sideboards tends to use architectural motifs adhered to in standard sideboards forms, such as acanthus leaves, swags and foliage, guilloche bands, and scrolls. The use of these motifs was not new, as they were employed as ornament in both the Renaissance and Baroque periods. What was new was how the motifs were adapted, added to, and incorporated within the decorative schemes
encountered through travel on the Grand Tour and the discoveries made in ancient sites.
French Mahogany Wooden Sideboards
France was the first country to embrace mahogany sideboards, although it was not until late 1700`s that the final vestiges of Rococo were erased from the decorative library. The French furniture of taste, the Comte de Caylus (1692-1765), was instrumental in introducing Classicism, including Classical sideboards, to France, publishing in 1752 the first of seven volumes of Recueilk d’antiduites egyptiennes, etruscanes, grecques et romaines, in which he discussed and illustrated the tastes and styles of the ancient world.
Mahogany Neoclassical sideboards tends to be rectangular and lacks curves. This did not happen at once, as larger pieces often remained in stock after fashions had changed and cabinet-makers adapted the Rococo
forms by applying Neoclassical decoration. In this French transitional style, serpentine shapes were gradually straightened and cabriole legs evolved into turned or tapered legs. Chair backs were rectangular or oval with turned legs, often fluted in reference to Classical architectural columns.
Throughout the Neoclassical period, building booms influenced the production of furnishings. More palaces were built in Russia in the second half of the 18th century than in any other European country. These new
buildings, and refurbished older buildings, required new sideboards, as most of the existing pieces lacked sufficient pomp and majesty for Catherine the Great’s court. Most Russian sideboards was imported front Paris, as Russian taste tended to emulate French style. The German ebeniste, David Roentgen , made sideboards specifically For his Russian clientele that was far more flamboyant than French court sideboards.
Adam Style Sideboards.
The Neoclassical style in England — home to the innovative architecture of Robert Adam — adapted some French forms such as the commode and the “French chair”. Adam’s sideboards complemented the light colours used in his interiors and textiles, and painted decoration featured more than
Parisian gueridon Made of rosewood, kingwood, and sycamore, this table is inlaid with musical instruments and has a brass gallery.
in its French Counterparts. Greek vase paintings greatly influenced Adam, and lie often used painted panels in his work; these might be the central panel of a demi-lune or rectangular commode, or a centred rounded at the top of a pier glass flanked by carved maidens and urns. Thomas Chippendale also worked in the
Neoclassical style, producing a pair of rectangular pedestals with urns, a sideboard table, and wine cooler for the dining room at Hardwood House. For this commission he used circular inlaid medallions on the pedestals with carved swags and rams’ heads above, to match the other pieces.
The pattern books published by George Hepplewhite and Thomas Sheraton simplified Adam’s sideboards designs for the mass market. Their designs were hugely influential, particularly in America. sideboards in this style is termed Federal style after the new US government and often features the official symbol of the American eagle. Swedish sideboards from this time is referred to as Gustavian after King Gustav III who admired the work of the French cabinet-makers so much that lie invited them to work in Sweden. When he could not afford to pay them, they returned home, but left their sideboards style as a lasting legacy. Danish sideboards was simpler and often made from darker woods. Decoration was limited to dentil moulding, the Greek key motif, and rosettes.
European sideboards fashion tended to fellow French or English Neoclassical taste in antique furniture: in Spain, the north was inspired by English styles, while in the south, Neo classical and Adam sideboards were dominant.
18th Century Antique French Sideboards. 1700`s Rococo Louis XV Sideboards.
XVIII Century Antique French Sideboards. 1700`s Rococo Louis XV Sideboards.
18th Century French sideboards were handmade after accession of Philip of Orleans as French Regent upon the death of Louis XIV in 1700 marked the beginning of a transition from the unaccommodating formalities of the Baroque towards the more animated Rococo. The migration of the French court from Versailles to Paris, where aristocrats and the bourgeoisie began to refurbish their townhouses elaborately and with great
concern for Rococo style of early xviii century, ushered in an age which focused unprecedented attention on comfort in private life and antique Louis XIV furniture style.
In 1700`s France especially, rooms became smaller : throughout Europe social hierarchies were more relaxed and entertainment more intimate. Rising standards of living and the expansion of the middle classes made
the ceremonies of the Baroque passe, and removed the complicated network of symbols of rank that had been incorporated into everyday social interaction.
The release from Baroque court circles, which had been primarily preoccupied by the immediacies of their own pomposity, sparked off in the 18th century a series of quests for the exotic, the whimsical and the
refreshing. These yearnings were satisfied in the fine and large of Louis the 15th sideboards by such light-hearted schemes as Jean Honore Fragonard’s painting of The Swing, and the tapestry scenes of the
Loves of the Gods, woven after Francois Boucher’s example at the Gobelins manufactories. Continuing trade heightened European taste for things oriental, from tea and porcelain tea-services to the lacquered mahogany and oak sideboards that went with them. In France, comfortable salons, where ladies of the ancien regime conducted conversations between dandies and philosopher, were increasingly fitted through the century with small and serviceable pieces of elegant sideboards. Walls were hung with tapestries, silks, or velvets, or wainscoted with fluidly-moulded panels painted in combinations of colours, such as mint green, pale pinks and yellows.
The softening of the rectilinear Louis XIV style furniture was initiated by the designer Jean Berain and the craftsman Andre Charles Boulle, with the influence of the Regent’s own architect A. J. Oppenord (c.1639-1715), the architects Robert de Cotte (1656-1735) and Pierre le Pautre, and the designers Nicolas Pineau (1687-1757) and Jacques Caffieri (1678-1755).
After the turn of the century, Berain replaced his earlier scrolling designs with lighter, linear arabesques and fanciful singeries. Chairs, tables, bureaux and commodes assumed serpentine lines, stretchers became fluid
and were gradually discarded ; and chairs became lower. Rich ormolu mounts highlighted the curves of cabriole legs, the edges of drawers and the tops of sideboard buffets. On the elegant, increasingly curvaceous
buffet of Charles Cressent (1685-1768), the edging around drawers gradually disappeared, giving way to large compositions spreading over the lacquer or marquetry design of the facade. Cressent became ebeniste to the Regent in 1719 and was one of the finest ebenistes of all time. It was not until late 18th Century though that ebenistes were required to sign their sideboard with an estampille and as a result no pieces actually signed by Crescent are known. Many antique French sideboards have been subsequently attributed to him, often on little evidence, but dining room sideboards in many collections, including the Wallace 18th Century Antique Collection and the Gulbenkian , are undoubtedly by him. He designed his own gilt-bronze mounts many of which were inspired by the designs of Berain, Gillot and Robert de Cotte, and stand as masterpieces of sculpture. 2 door claw foot sideboards of Juste Aurele Meissonnier (1695-1750) led the early designs of the Regence into the exuberant asymmetries and curvaceous naturalism of the Rococo, or Louis XV style. Derived from the lively, cave-like, and sometimes aquatic decorations inside Italian landscape grottoes, French Rococo sideboards were characterized by illogical combinations of the peculiar rocaille scroll, C- and S-curves, shells, foliage, branches and animals, water and flame motifs, and even Chinese figures. Commodes, tables, cabinets and beds assumed fluid shapes. Ormolu mounts became more swirling and elegant, and delicately carved flames and sprays of foliage emphasized the curves of knees, elbows, edges and crests.