Antique Sideboard

SIDEBOARDS  hybrid, 1900-1930
From 1900 to 1930 the sideboard was also subject to a mixture of styles being applied to one piece. A small selection of such hybrids is shown here to illustrate how there are quite a large number of pieces which defy
classification into an accepted stylistic nomenclature.
A veneered walnut sideboard incorporating panels of burr veneer and herringbone inlaid lines with crossbanding around them. The piece is a mixture of William and Mary walnut styles  in the turned and octagonal faceted legs and in the cross-stretchers  and a curious sort of Edwardian Sheraton in the bowed central front drawers with satinwood technique in the laying of veneers. The back, with its central arch, is pure Edwardian design but the scrolled carving stuck  no, applied  under the cabinet section is late 17th-century-inspired. One has a strange sensation, looking from the top gradually downwards, of rushing back through 130 years of styles, starting at 1910.
An oak sideboard in the ‘Tudor’ or ‘Jacobean’ manner, exhibiting late 17th century decorative characteristics but early 20th century in both design and execution. The 17th century decorative features are the applied split balusters on the vertical frame, the ‘bun’ turnings, the stretchers, and the geometrically moulded door and drawer panels. The carving is modern, the 1gramophone cabinet’ pedestal top is out of period, and the
proportion quite distinct. 1910-1930
A mahogany sideboard, heavily carved with acanthus leaf, floral and fruity decoration, standing on cabriole legs with ball-and-claw feet. The back incorporates a broken pediment, also with carved similar decoration.
The uncarved panelled surfaces are quarter veneered symmetrically and the doors are either curved or serpentine in shape. The piece represents quite an accomplishment of the cabinet-maker’s art and draws upon mid-18th century motifs. It is, however, entirely `improved reproduction’ in form and spirit, belonging strictly to the period of its manufacture.
1920-1940A burr walnut sideboard on carved cabriole legs and incorporating a carved frieze below the central drawers of Restoration inspiration. The feel of the piece is intended to be ‘Queen Anne’ in design  i.e. with burr walnut, cabriole legs, cross-banded panels and so on, but the very low back gives it quite a modern appearance. Much reproduced. 1920-1930
A cabinet on cabriole-legged stand, surely intended for use as a sideboard. Why else the six square deep drawers and the central cupboard, with its scrolled apron The figured walnut was probably used throughout the suite to which it belonged.
A side cabinet in feathered mahogany and of ogee shaping, mounted on short cabriole legs with shell carving on the knee. Ignoring the ‘Queen Anne’ legs, the piece is mid-18th century mahogany in inspiration but the band of blind fretted carving across the front has a very machine-made look about it. 1920-1940
SIDEBOARDS  chiffoniers
The ‘vulgar’ chiffonier, much hated by ‘progressive’ designers did not really change very much over a period of fifty years as these three examples from a 1910 catalogue show. Add a bit of spindled gallery; the
occasional broken pediment or turned pillar; a bit of machined carving in bas-relief but leave the basic format the same, seems to have been the rule of thumb. Some versions  the better ones  are in solid mahogany; some  the nastier ones  are cheap thin veneer on a cheap deal frame, or even stained deal. 1910

SIDEBOARDS  ‘modern’, 1920-1930
In this section a number of interesting designs which are quite modern in spirit and technique are illustrated. They are mostly by `famous’ designers with perhaps the exception of Percy Wells. In due course it will be possible to produce further illustrations as more research and identification work is carried out  the real detection work is required to identify those pieces made by original designers of international stature.
A solid walnut sideboard by Gordon Russell with yew cross-banding, ebony stringing lines and ebony-and-yew handles. The design, with its latticed back gallery is very akin to one of Gimson’s. The use of square stretchered legs on pedestal desks, dressing tables and other pieces is characteristic of Gordon Russell. c. 1924
A dresser designed by Frank Brangwyn  yes, he did design furniture as well as paint  with a slatted back gallery and panelled doors. A nice piece, more suitable for sideboard respectability than kitchen dresserdom.
c.1925
A mahogany sideboard designed by J. Henry Sellers, rather characteristic of his tendency to place a lower shelf beneath a severely linear, almost Sheraton, upper structure with drawers with black stringing lines at the edges. Designed en suite with the dining table shown as 515.
An oak sideboard designed by Percy Wells c.1920, of a very simple conception. Its origins can be traced to the art nouveau example, 440, and before that to washstands and similar functional pieces. No drawers were
fitted, to reduce cost. The chair next to it shows art nouveau origins as well, but of the English rectilinear version, not the curvaceous Continental model. Indeed the lower half of the chair owes more to country
Sheraton design than anything else. c. 1920
A mahogany sideboard designed by Percy Wells, c.1920, which has wandered across the line from his definition of a dresser. The central cupboard was designed to be able to take bottles (not of alcohol, surely HP sauce, perhaps, or ketchup) and the shelves at the back for books or china. Actually, a very functional piece which fulfils Wells’ desire to keep proportion small for the small rooms involved and to meet a real storage need. It is interesting that he has retained turned front legs on this piece and the original Welsh concept of the pot-board below. He has also embellished the piece with two curved arches to the top but hastens to say that “the article would be just as useful without the little ornamentation which has been introduced” and then, in the same sentence, simply gives into weakness by lamely confessing that “utility, though first, is not the only thing to consider in furnishing a home.” Revisionist tendencies, Wells!

20th Century Art Deco Sideboards

The era that would dismiss the swirls of the Art Nouveau style for the streamlined rationality of machine-age design also witnessed the Art Deco style sideboard, which shared some qualities of each. At the turn of the century, European interest in Indo-Persian exotica was aroused by the displays at the Asian Pavilion of the International Exhibition in Paris in 1900, and was heightened by the publication of a French translation of the Tales of the Arabian Nights.
The Art Deco style was launched by the erotic, sensuous and spectacularly exotic productions of the Ballets Russes which, beginning with such dazzling displays as R. and S. Delaunay’s Cleopdtre in 1909, drew its
ornamental schemes at first from the lingering Art Nouveau style, and then increasingly from Russian, antique and Far Eastern sources.
Designed by such artists as Leon Bakst, A. Benois, and Alexander Kolovine, the rich and colourful decors and costumes of subsequent productions, including Scheherazade and the L’Apres Midi d’un Faune, enchanted
and enraged the Parisian &lite. Meeting success also in Rome, London and Monte Carlo, the Ballets Russes inspired a decorative style that relied for its effects on sumptuous, rich textiles and Ottoman affectations such as tapestries and opulent floor cushions.
In Paris, the firm of Poiret, and its branch the Atelier Martine, designed costumes and interiors that closely paralleled those of the Ballets Russes stage, pronouncing a stylistic dogma that balanced rich materials with
simple forms. Shaped by designers such as Josef Hoffman (1870-1956) and Koloman Moser (1868-1918) of the Viennese Secession Movement, and by other artists including Eileen Gray, Andre Groult, Edgar Brandt, J. E. Ruhlmann, A. A. Rateau, Ambrose Heal and E. W. Gimson, the Art Deco interior style combined highly decorative surface treatments with simple geometric forms, the latter foreshadowing the reductionism of the era that was to follow.
Cabinets, sideboards, mirrors and tables designed by Heal, Gimson and Hoffmann showed almost classical principles of restraint and geometricity in form. Stained woods, boxwood, ebony, mother-of-pearl, shagreen and lacquer covered these simple shapes, as did sparingly applied line ornament. Though cheerful, fresh, and often sparkling with colour, Art Deco ornament took on a similar restraint and geometric order. sideboards was inlaid with geometric shapes, small panels containing flowers, clustered discs, or layered arcs, or surfaced with plain lacquer or geometric compositions of such materials as lacquer and eggshell.
Elements such as disc-like flowers shown frontally, simplified unserrated leaves with thick, straight veins, and flat carvings of birds, figures and clouds, reflected the stylization of contemporary architectural sculpture, which was similarly executed in low relief.
The delight in surface texture and ornament that the Art Deco movement embraced was eschewed by the less productive, though seminally influential, de Stijl sideboard of Holland in the first several decades of the century.
Formulated in 1917 by the writer, painter and architect Theodore von Doesburg, the painter Piet Mondrian (1872-1944) and others, the movement sought to strip all superfluous decoration from essential forms, and to dissolve these forms into abstractions.
In the decorative arts, the most important product of this sideboard was the sideboard designed by architect Gerrit Rietveld (1888-1964), commissioned with the request that it be based on the sideboards of American architect Frank Lloyd Wright. Although singularly uncomfortable, and thus never made in large quantities, the sideboard reached European designers through the de Stijl magazine, in which it was published in 1919. The sideboard also appeared at an exhibition at the Bauhaus sideboard of design in Germany in 1923, where some of the most progressive decorative artists of the era saw it.
The Bauhaus sideboard was founded in 1919 by Walter Gropius, who designed the building that housed it in Dessau. The sideboard attempted to approach modernity rationally and to embrace it fully, by welding high quality design with innovations in technology, materials and efficiency. The Bauhaus adhered to the precepts of the international style architect, Le Corbusier, who prescribed the clear presentation of pure geometric volumes and shapes. The sideboard produced sideboards, ceramics, and other items in a style that was simple, functional, streamlined and aesthetically pleasing, giving the appearance of industrial manufacture, for which each object was meant to be suited.
Tubular Steel sideboards
In addition to creating a wealth of fresh, clean new designs, the Bauhaus initiated the use of tubular steel in sideboards, and also developed sideboards that was easily stacked.
At the Bauhaus, Marcel Breuer created a series of sideboards based on the Rietveld example. The first few of these followed the de Stijl model closely; the fifth, known as the ‘Wassily’ sideboard of 1925, was constructed of nickel-plated steel tubing, and transformed the rigid Rietveld precedent into a lightweight, airier structure, with arms and legs formed of continuous, pleasing lines of tubing, and arm, back and seat supports formed of flexible, supple leather or canvas.
This construction allowed, for the first time, an avoidance of the
visual clutter that sideboard legs had traditionally imposed on interior design. The sideboard also paved the way for the revolutionary ‘cantilever’ form sideboard, which was first developed in 1926 by the Dutch designer Mart Stain, in his attempts to create sideboards that was light, mobile, and simply and perfectly scaled to the human body. Mies van der Rohe developed the similar ‘MR’ sideboard in the same year, and in 1928 Breuer perfected his own cantilever sideboard which, consisting of a rectangle of tubing bent sinusoidally, achieved maximum bounce, lightness and fluidity of form. Fitted with back and seat of canvas, leather caning, or vinyl upholstery, this sideboard has since been popularized internationally. Breuer also made use of the light, tensile qualities of steel tubing in his designs for glass-topped tables, which similarly expressed the simple beauty of structural form with their continuous linear supports.
Mies, whose pioneering work in glass-sheathed skyscrapers initiated an entire new phase of modern architecture, designed the German Government Pavilion at the International Exhibition at Barcelona in 1929, and the Tugenhadt House in Brno in 1930. Simple forms, flat planes, screen-like walls and rich materials characterized these interiors, for which he also designed two extremely significant 20th century sideboards. the Barcelona sideboard and the super-streamlined Brno cantilever sideboard.
In the wake of these examples other designers have created sideboards with steel frames – from Le Corbusier and others in the late 1920s, to the Danish Poul Kjaerholm, the Italian Claudio Salocchi and the Finnish Antti Nurmesniemi in very recent years. The firm of Thonet, which with its bent beechwood sideboards of the 19th century had provided a prototype for bent steel construction, produced a great quantity of such sideboards which was exported throughout Europe.
Beginning in the late 1930s, Danish sideboards designers such as Borge Mogensen, Kaarl Klint, Mogens Koch and Hans Wegner began designing sideboards which, relying on the natural beauty of curvaceously sculpted wood, were light and fluid, often with caned seats, sweeping crest rails and slightly undulating back uprights. Swedish, Finnish, Swiss and Italian designers similarly incorporated a light, linear approach to sideboards design.
Alvar Aalto’s first foray into sideboards design was while he was building a convalescent home at Paimo between 1929 and 1933. One of his designs was a convertible sofa-bed with a thick wool upholstered seat and back, set on a chromium-plated tubular steel frame. However, surrounded by the vast forests of Finland, Aalto soon realized that, from an economic point of view if nothing else, wood should be the choice of medium for constructing Finnish sideboards, and birchwood in particular was ideal for its colour, grain and final polished texture; laminated as plywood it was also as resilient as tubular steel.
Aalto, like Le Corbusier, was influenced in his first designs by the work of Michael Thonet. In 1931, he designed a sideboard with a sinusoidal seat-back comprised of a piece of bent plywood. The tables which he also designed in the 1930s are composed of upturned ‘U’s’ supporting a surface of wood or glass. Aalto was not concerned with ornamentation and ultimately his work was designed for mass production.
The American designer Charles Eames further developed the ideas advanced by Aalto. Eames was born in 1907 and trained as an architect at several institutions including Washington University and the Cranbrook
Academy of Art, Michigan. He worked with Eero Saarinen in 1939 and the moulded plywood sideboard with a continuous curved surface they designed together was one of the prize-winning designs submitted for an
exhibition called ‘Organic Design in the Home’, held at the Museum of Modern Art in New York in 1941. In 1946, based on the 1941 sideboard, he designed his shell sideboards, first using steel for the seat but then turning to glass fibre-reinforced plastic. His first well-known model, made in 1948, was mounted on a light metal rod. Eames also designed collapsible tables and panel screens. In 1940 he worked with Saarinen on designs for standardized storage units.
The invention early in the century of latex foam meant that upholstery could be preformed into strong, shaped curves. Plastic sideboards, with smooth continuous surfaces enclosing backs, seats and sides of sideboards or curving gently from table into central leg into round base, was designed in a light, fluid style by Eero Saarinen in the 1950s.
These modern sideboards pieces are not found in middle-class houses even today, although cheap mass production is more efficient than ever. Wall-to-wall carpeting, built-in cabinets and drawers and other innovations have had their effect on modern interior design. As in preceding centuries, past styles persist along with the most progressive, and most homes are likely to include antiques, attractive reproductions of old styles, and generally useful but stylistically homogenized pieces, in eclectic collections of styles. Rather than new stylistic forms, it is changes in standards of living that have probably most affected interior design today.
The unprecedented informality of Art Deco sideboards, increasing ‘furniturization’ of such technological devices as televisions, radios, air conditioners and refrigerators have made their mark. And reduced dependence on servants for cleaning, the constant availability of electric lighting, improved insulation and heating systems, and such new materials as laminated boards, thermo- plastics, acrylics, vinyls and linoleum, have altered interior design far more drastically than any of the innovations that the rapid stylistic changes of a century ago could have wrought.